-
“I can steal whatever I want to because people are embarrassed to look at me, and even more embarrassed to say things to me. But I’m still white.”
-
She said, ‘At that time I could not see anything lying anywhere; without any reason I was compelled to take the objects. They were not things that pleased me particularly; I had to take them, I had no peace until I did.’ For four years the patient had maintained intimate relations with a sexually impotent man. When he finally regained his generative power and she found herself pregnant, her impulse to steal disappeared. (She no longer needed to take something that did not belong to her.) The question put to her by a confessor, who examined her in regard to her sexual experiences, whether she had taken the penis in her hand and introduced it herself, made a particular impression on her. The number of objects stolen was very large: stockings, furs, gloves, little bags, bracelets, rings, umbrellas, etc. Whoever has occupied himself with psycho-analysis will recognize at once that these things have pronounced sexual significance. (A little bag, a ring, a bracelet, furs, stockings, gloves, are all articles into which we put something; umbrella is a frequently occurring symbol for penis, probably because opening it suggests erection.)
In his psycho-analysis, Gross at once recognizes the sexual root of this case of kleptomania. The patient is moved “to do something forbidden, secretly” or, more clearly expressed, to take something forbidden, secretly. (Compare the question in the confessional, whether she had “taken the penis in her hand.”) Gross remarks, “thus the origin of the symptom of kleptomania is laid bare: ‘to take something forbidden, secretly,’ is common to both motives, to the sexual desire and to the impulse to steal; this association causes the emotional energy of the unconscious sexual motive to be transferred to the motive to steal, which, characteristically, as an idea at least, succumbs to a much slighter mental resistance. When the transference has become firmly fixed, as regards the contents, from then on the impulse to steal remains definitely the ‘symbol’ for every desire for sexual gratification and absorbs the whole emotional volume, all the impulsive energy of sexuality—becomes irresistible like sexual instinct. And this displaced accentuation of passion causes the pathological irresistible impulse.”
Wilhelm Stekel, “The Root of Kleptomania,” 1911. -
As Dr. Stekel has repeatedly proved to himself by psycho-analysis, the root of all these cases of kleptomania is ungratified sexual instinct. These women fight against temptation. They are engaged in a constant struggle with their desires. They would like to do what is forbidden, but they lack the strength. Theft is to them a symbolic act. The essential point is that they do something that is forbidden, touch something that does not belong to them.
Wilhelm Stekel, “The Root of Kleptomania” in Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1911. -
Il m’est impossible de dire ce qui c’est passé en moi; le tentation a été plus forte que moi! Je ne sais pas ce qui c’est produit. Mais je pris cet objet et je l’ai caché!
Some hypothetical french woman on her reasons for shoplifting some hypothetical french trifle fromBontemps or Lasegue or Letulle or something, sometime before 1911. -
guys i just thought you should know shopping is like golf but for women
thank you kohls for blessing me with this information.
shoplifting is like golf but for women
(Source: nopockyforkitty)
-
Plays: 90[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]
Choking Victim // Five finger discount
This one goes out to all my ladiez
(Source: inherit-the-wasteland)
-
shoplifting is obviously so important, and the way we talk about shoplifting is also really important. because: it’s a current of resistance strategies that gets traded orally among women. among men, too, to be sure, but i was thinking about how the punk men i know talk about shoplifting and it’s usually an oblique reference and something about security culture and the exchange stops. which, security culture, for sure, but also women (punx or not) almost never react that way. i have spent literally hours talking shop (as it were) with new and old (not-dude) friends about shoplifting strategy in a way that i can’t or don’t seem to with men, and i couldn’t venture as to why, necessarily (some masculinist ego-driven overblown sense of paranoia, who can say) but anyway, shoplifting is magic in my real world, which is to say, witchery.
I would say Lucas is the obvious exception to this. While Lucas ~finds things in stores for feminism (food that I can eat now that I can’t have some foods, makeup for me, tools), he’s probably also masculinizing our discourse BECAUSE now he has seen what you are capable of and feels like he has to compete with you because you totally made him feel impotent in comparison.
Either way, I win. I win LITERALLY MANY MAKEUPS.
(More sincerely, though: this oral trading is so important and I would consider doing actual social science research in this.)
-
I have never shoplifted in my life (I had kind of a wasted adolescence) and I’m too old to start now, but it like totally made me want to? Theory is powerful.
The next time someone asks me about the practical value of theory, I will cite this.
-
yeah, you should totally kick some of that theory over here. I feel icky about shoplifting mostly just because I’ve only seen white punk dudes do it (everyone else “grows out of it” I guess), and I generally hate most things that white punk dudes do.
This is something I started writing about last semester, though I was approaching it from a theory perspective I found that a lot of what exists is historical and/or criminological. The literature you are going to find is mainly:
- The history and criminology of shoplifting as a feminized act
- Because historically it has almost always been committed by women, or anyway, it has almost always been women who are charged with it
- In the early stages of commerce culture (ie, the Victorian era), public comments very often linked the feminization of the crime to women’s new presence in public and commercial life, and read it less as a pathology and more as a reaction to HOW MUCH STUFF WOMEN CAN HAVE AND WANT NOW THAT THEY CAN GO TO STORES
- But since then, it has been very rarely read in terms of women’s relationship with feminized material culture and people almost always argue that it is representative of a pathology
- Which is bullshit, even though I think most of us recognize that there is a psycho/physiological thrill associated with it
- But, like: there’s also a psycho/physiological thrill associated with smashing the patriarchy, that doesn’t mean that I do it because of how my brain is wired
- Anyway, the other main strands of literature about shoplifting focus on how it was presented starting in the counterculture movement (ie, Steal This Book) and within anarchist circles, and from what I read (including in some of these zines), there are almost no women’s voices present in this discussion
- But we know, from our oral presence and because we know, that shoplifting was part of a form of uniquely feminist resistance. We know this, we remember this, sometimes in feminist readings since the seventies there will be mention of it, “…shoplifting as tiny resistances against sexist commercialization…” But almost no one has really taken some time to see how all of these pieces fit together
- A few feminist organizations have looked at how women, especially nonwhite women, are hugely and disproportionately prosecuted for shoplifting. This was actually one of the main political focuses of Off Our Backs in the early 1980s, I’ve discovered. There were even cases where women who had been involved in other behaviors (feminist activism, rape revenge, immigrant activism, labor organizing) were actually scapegoated by cops on shoplifting charges
- How can you be a young adult woman, how can you listen to your fellow young adult women, and not know that there is something about shoplifting (especially the shoplifting of makeup) which is part of our feminist consciousness? It’s there, and we need to talk about it. So much talk about shoplifting experiences has been a major part of feminist consciousness raising for people in my age group.
- It’s interesting, too, that this arose out of a white privilege of invisibility but also resulted in it being much more difficult for a woman to get away with shoplifting because the profile of a shoplifter has become a woman, making her increasingly visible. Plus, it seems like most shoplifters are “caught” (detained, etc.) because they don’t know their rights when it comes to that sort of thing—like, I would argue that loss prevention is extremely predatory. I had one friend tell me that when she was a preteen, she lifted some mascara, and when she got caught, a guy held her in a room and told her if she gave him a hundred dollars then he wouldn’t call the cops. I can’t imagine that that’s the worse that has happened to girls in that situation.
-
Essie Nail Laquer in Power Clutch and Bordeaux.
I feel faaaancy.
THIS IS WHAT A FEMINIST HERO LOOKS LIKE
(Source: daintyasshit)